|
Fulton's Experiments with Steam | The Clermont | Warships | Robert Fulton |
The "Fulton the First," as she was called, was then considered an enormous vessel. The hull was double, 156 feet long, 56 feet wide, and 20 feet deep, measuring 2,475 tons. In May the ship was ready for her engine, and in July was so far completed as to steam, on a trial-trip, to the ocean at Sandy Hook and back, 53 miles, in eight hours and twenty minutes. In September, with armament and stores on board, the ship made for sea and for battle; the same route was traversed, the vessel making 5.5 miles an hour. Her engine, having a steam-cylinder 48 inches in diameter and of 5 feet stroke of piston, was furnished with steam by a copper boiler 22 feet long, 12 feet wide, and 8 feet high, and turned a wheel, between the two halls, 16 feet in diameter, with "buckets" 14 feet long, and a dip of 4 feet. The sides were 4 feet 10 inches thick, and her spar-deck was surrounded by musket-proof bulwarks. The armament consisted of 30 32-pounders, intended to discharge red-hot shot. There was one mast for each hull, fitted with lateen sails. Large pumps were carried, intended to throw streams of water on the decks of the enemy, with a view to disabling him by wetting his ordnance and ammunition. A submarine gun was to have been carried at each bow, to discharge shot weighing one hundred pounds, at a depth of ten feet below water.
This, for the time, tremendous engine-of-war was constructed in response to a demand from the citizens of New York for a means of harbour defence. They appointed what was called a Coast
and Harbour Defence Committee; and this committee examined Fulton's plans, and called the attention of the General Government to them. The Government appointed a Board of Experts
from among its most famous naval officers, induding Commodore Decatur, Captains Paul Jones, Evans, and Biddle, Commodore Perry; and Captains Warrington and Lewis. They reported
unanimously in favour of the proposed construction, and set forth her advantages over all previously known forms of war-vessel. The citizens' committee offered to guarantee the expense of
building the ship; and the construction was undertaken under the supervision of a committee appointed for the purpose, consisting of several then distinguished men, both military and naval.
Congress authorized the building of coast-defence vessels by the President, in March, 1814, and Fulton at once started the work of construction, Messrs. Adam and Noah Brown building the
hull, and the engines being placed on board and in working order within a year.
|
Robert Fulton died in the service of the United States government; and although engaged for years in devoting time and talents to the best interests of our country, still the public records show that the Government was indebted to his estate upwards of $100,000 for moneys actually expended and services rendered by him, agreeably to contract. When the legislature, then in session at Albany, heard of the death of Mr. Fulton, they expressed their sentiments of regret by resolving that the members of both houses should wear mourning for six weeks. This is the only instance, According to Colden, up to that time, of such pubhc testimonials of regret, esteem, and respect being offered on the death of a private citizen, who was only distinguished by his virtues, his genius, and his talents. He was buried February 25, 1815. His funeral was attended by all the oflicers of the National and State governments then in the city, by the magistracy, the common council, a number of societies, and a greater number of citizens than had ever been collected on any similar occasion. When the procession began to move, and until it arrived at Trinity Church, minute-guns were fired from the steam-frigate and the Battery. His body is deposited in a vault belonging to the Livingston family. Mr. Fulton is described as a tall man, about six feet in height, slender, but well proportioned. "Nature had made him a gentleman, and bestowed upon him ease and gracefulness." He had too much good sense to exhibit affectation, and confidence in his own worth and talents gave him a pleasing deportment in all companies. His features were strong and handsome; he had large dark eyes, a projecting brow, and features expressive of intelligence and thought; his disposition was mild yet lively, and he was fond of society. He conversed with energy, fluency, and correctness; and, owing more to experience and reflection than to books, he was often interesting in his originality. In all his social relations he was kind, generous, and affectionate. His only use for money was to make it an aid to charity, hospitality, and the promohon of science. He was especially distinguished by constancy, industry, and that union of patience and persistence which overcame every difficulty.
Robert Fulton has never, even yet, received either in kind or degree the credit that is justly his due. Those members of the engineering profession who have become familiar with his work through the ordinary channels of information generally look upon him as a talented artist and fortunate amateur engineer, whose fancies led him into many strange vagaries, and whose enthusiastic advocacy of a new method of transportation - the success of which was already assured by the ingenuity and skill of James Watt, Oliver Evans, and John Fitch, and by the really intelligent methods of those early professional engineers, the Messrs. Stevens - gave him the opportunity of grasping the prize of which Chancellor Livingston had secured the legal control. By such engineers as know only of his work on the Seine and the Hudson in the introduction of the steamboat, he is not considered as an inventor, but simply as one who profited by the inventions of others, and who, taking advantage of circumstances, and gaining credit which was not of right wholly his own, acquired a reputation vastly out of proportion to his real merits. The layman, judging only from the popular traditions, and the incomplete historical accounts that have come to him, supposes Robert Fulton to have been the inventor of the steamboat, and on that ground regards him as one of the greatest mechanics and engineers that the world has seen. The truth undoubtedly is, as we have now seen, that Fulton was not "the inventor of the steamboat," and that the reputation acquired by his successful introduction of steam-navigation is largely accidental, and is principally due to the possession, in company with Livingston, of a monopoly which drove from this most promising field those original and skilful engineers, Evans and the Stevenses. No one of the essential devices successfully used by Fulton in the "Clermont," his first North River steamboat, was new; and no one of them differed, to any great extent, from devices successfully adopted by earlier experimenters. Fulton's success was a commercial success purely. John Stevens had, in 1804, built a successful screw steam-vessel; and his paddle-steamer of 1807, the "Phoenix," was very possibly a better piece of engineering than the "Clermont." John Fitch had, still earlier, used both screw and paddle. In England, Miller and Symmington and Lord Dundas had antedated even Fulton's earliest experiments on the Seine. Indeed, it seems not at all unlikely that Papin, a century earlier (in 1707), had he been given a monopoly of steam-navigation on the Weser or the Fulda, and had he been joyfully hailed by the Hanoverians as a public benefactor, as was Fulton in the United States, instead of being proscribed and assaulted by the mob who destroyed his earlier "Clermont," might have been equally successful; or it may be that the French inventor, Jouffroy, who experimented on the rivers of France twenty-five years before Fulton, might, with similar encouragement, have gained an equal success. Yet although Fulton was not in any true sense "the inventor of the steamboat," his services in the work of introducing that miracle of our modern time cannot be overestimated; and, aside from his claim as the first to grasp success among the many who were then bravely struggling to place steam-navigation on a permanent and safe basis, he is undeniably entitled to all the praise that has ever been accorded him on such different ground.
Relationships are made up of two parts - the "cousinhood" and the amount removed. The first identifies how
close the families were - first cousins, for example, would be the children of siblings. The amount removed can
be thought of as the difference in generations. Henry Livingston was born in 1748, making him two years younger
than Chancellor Livingston, his second cousin. The Chancellor's parents were of Henry's parents' generation, and
are once removed from Henry. The Fultons were closer to the age of Henry's children, and Harriet is Henry's 2nd
cousin, once removed the other direction.
|
|
All Henry Livingston's Poetry, All Clement Moore's Poetry Historical Articles About Authorship Many Ways to Read Henry Livingston's Poetry
Arguments,
Smoking Gun?,
Reindeer Names,
First Publication,
Early Variants
|
Copyright © 2003, InterMedia Enterprises